Criteria for Evaluating Websites
This document, "Criteria for Evaluating Websites," is also available as a PDF for easy printing.
ACCURACY
- Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her? Is this person qualified to write this document?
- What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced?
|
- Make sure author provides e-mail or a contact address/phone number.
- Know the distinction between author and Webmaster.
|
AUTHORITY
- Who published the document, and is the publisher different from the "Webmaster?"
- What institution publishes this document?
- Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?
|
- What credentials are listed for the author(s)?
- Where is the document published? Check URL domains to see the name of the institution that published the document.
|
OBJECTIVITY
- What goals/objectives does this page meet?
- How detailed is the information?
- Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?
|
- Determine if page is a mask for advertising, if so, information might be biased.
- View any Web page as you would an infomercial on television. Ask yourself: Why was this written and for whom?
|
CURRENCY
- When was it produced?
- When was it updated?
- How up-to-date are the links (if any)?
|
- How many dead links are on the page?
- Are the links current or updated regularly?
- Is the information on the page outdated?
- For the purposes they serve, do these pages provide GOOD and Enough links to related information?
|
COVERAGE
- Are the links (if any) evaluated, and do they complement the theme?
- Is the Web page all images or a balance of text and images?
- Is the information presented cited correctly?
|
- If page required special software to view the information, how much are you missing if you don't have the software?
- Is it free, or is there a fee to obtain the information?
- Is there an option for test only or frames, or a suggested browser for better viewing?
|
Kapoun, Jim. "Questioning Web authority: How a librarian trains students to assess Web page credibility." Aft On Campus 18.5 (2000) : 4.
Sites to help you evaluate information:
CSICOP (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal)
QuackWatch
SpinSanity: Countering Rhetoric with Reason - evaluates news stories
Statistical Resources on the Web
Urban Legends Reference Pages
The Virtual Chase - Groups that alert the public to internet fraud, fanaticism and bad information